On Friday, the court will conference on whether to hear any of the cases before it (Prop8, several DOMA cases, and a case from AZ on partner benefits). From C
hris Geidner, a consideration of the possible outcomes. I'm hoping for version 4.
• The court takes multiple DOMA cases and the Proposition 8 case. This outcome would be the “all in” option, and it would make clear that at least four justices want the court to resolve the legal questions surrounding these issues, from what level of scrutiny that laws classifying people based on sexual orientation should be given (see more about this here) to whether gay couples have a constitutional right to marry.....
• The court takes one DOMA case, while holding the other DOMA cases pending that decision, and takes the Proposition 8 case as well. This is not very different from the first possibility, although the choice of one DOMA case over another could be seen as narrowing the type of argument about the law that the court would like to hear. ...
• The court takes a DOMA case (or multiple DOMA cases) and holds the rest of the cases, including Proposition 8, pending the outcome of the DOMA case. This prospect, advanced as a possibility by Georgetown law professor Nan Hunter, could be taken by a cautious court, wanting first to resolve some general questions — including the level of scrutiny to be applied to sexual orientation classifications — before acting on the other, more direct, question about whether same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry that is raised in the Proposition 8 challenge. ....
• The court takes a DOMA case (or multiple DOMA cases), but denies certiorari in the Proposition 8 case. This option, once considered by advocates to be the most likely possibility, would lead to same-sex couples being able to marry in California within days. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in the case did not broadly resolve the marriage question, instead holding that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional because it took back rights formerly held by Californians. As there are other cases in the legal pipeline about same-sex couples marriage rights that could make their way to the Supreme Court, the court could decide to let the narrow Ninth Circuit decision stand.
5 comments:
I'm hoping for 4 too. California has waited far too long for a resolution!
4 FTW.
What's the % of the US w/ SSM, once Calif is added (inc the November winners)? Probably add Illinois soon, too, and there's a big fat # to make SCOTUS feel safe for a bigger decision not TOO far down the line (but w/ maybe another Obama appointee or 2).
JCF, right now marriage is legal in 9 states, covering 13% of the population. CA would be the 10th state. Given its large population, this would mean approximately 25% of Americans would live in states with equality.
I take it no SCOTUS decision was reached today (Friday 11/30)?
No decision that they made public, which is not the same thing.
Post a Comment